Journal of Technology and Information Education 2023, 15(2):118-129 | DOI: 10.5507/jtie.2024.001

INQUIRY-BASED EDUCATION IN TECHNICAL EDUCATION

Ján STEBILA1, Mária KOŽUCHOVÁ2, Silvia BARNOVÁ3
1 Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, Slovenská republika
2 Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Slovenská republika
3 Vysoká škola DTI v Dubnici nad Váhom, Slovenská republika

In the article, we summarize some of the results obtained by researching the gradual implementation of innovative educational strategies (in the most recent case Inquiry-Based Education - further IBSE) to technical education at Slovak primary schools. The article shows the justification for the use of IBSE in teaching the subject Technology in lower secondary education. Thus, we focus in detail on the gradual implementation of innovative educational strategies into technical education at Slovak primary schools. The results point to the justification for the use of IBSE in teaching the subject Technology in lower secondary education.

Keywords: Inquiry-Based Education, Technical Education, Research, Teacher

Received: September 25, 2023; Revised: January 7, 2024; Accepted: September 25, 2023; Published: January 30, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
STEBILA, J., KOŽUCHOVÁ, M., & BARNOVÁ, S. (2023). INQUIRY-BASED EDUCATION IN TECHNICAL EDUCATION. Journal of Technology and Information Education15(2), 118-129. doi: 10.5507/jtie.2024.001
Download citation

References

  1. Al-Githami, S. S., Solangi, Z. A., Hamid, A. & Esmail, M. S. (2022). Investigation for utilization of training resourcesin technical education: A comparative study. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 9 (1), p. 128-137. Go to original source...
  2. Bond, L. et al. (2000). The certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct and consequential validity study. Greensboro: University of North Carolina.
  3. Darling-Hammond, L. et al. (2015). Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco: John Wiley&Sons Inc.
  4. Dostál, J. (2015). Badatelsky orientovaná výuka. Pojetí, podstata, význam a přínosy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. Go to original source...
  5. Dostál, J. & Kožuchová, M. (2016). Badatelský přístup v technickém vzdělávání: teorie a výsledky výzkumu. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. Go to original source...
  6. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. National Research Council. Canada: [online]. http:// www. downes.ca/files/Conective_knowlege-19.
  7. Duchovičová, J. (2019). Kritické myslenie a jeho psychodidaktická reflexia. Inauguračné prednášky. Nitra: PF UKF.
  8. Droščák, M. (2014). Aktivizujúce vyučovacie metódy v praxi strednej školy. Trnava: UCM.
  9. Droščák, M. (2015). Úvod do všeobecnej didaktiky pre študentov učiteľstva. Trnava: UCM.
  10. Hattie, J. A. C. (2003). Teacher Make a Difference: What is the research evidence? http://decd.sa.gov.au/limestecoast/files/pages/new/PLC.
  11. Huľová, Z. , Gašparová, M. & Gerová, Ľ. ( 2020). Učiteľ primárneho stupňa školy v príprave na technické vzdelávanie = Teachers of technical education at primary schools. In: Człowiek w dobie współczesnych wyzwań i zagrożeń. Białystok: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna w Białymstoku. (Poľsko), s. 187-201.
  12. Koníček, L. (2014). Počítačem podporované experimenty z fyziky a změny paradigmat vzdělávání. Ostrava: SVZZ.
  13. Kožuchová, M., Barnová, S., Stebila, J. & Krásna, S. (2023). Inquiry-Based Approach to Education. ACTA Educations Generalis. Dubnica and Váhom: DTI University, p. 50-62. Go to original source...
  14. Li, M., & Yuan, R. (2022). Enhancing students' metacognitive development in higher education: A classroom-based inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101947. Go to original source...
  15. Magoon, A. J. (1977). Constructivist approaches in educational research. Revue of Educational Research. 47(4), p. 651-693. Go to original source...
  16. Nezvalová, D. (2010). Kompetence a štandardy v počáteční příprave učitelů přírodovědných předmetů a matematiky. Olomouc: UP.
  17. Osborne, J., Dilon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflection. The Nuffield Foundation. London: [online]. htttp://hub.mspnet.org/index.cft/15065.
  18. Pavelka, J. et al. (2019). Interest of primary school pupils in technical activities and technical education. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia.
  19. Pellegrino, J. W. & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education of life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
  20. Pizzini, E. L. & Shepardson, P. (1991). Student questioning in the presence of the teacher during problem solving in science. School and Mathematics. 91/1991, n. 8. Go to original source...
  21. Plán obnovy. (2022). Komponent 7. Vzdelávanie pre 21. storočie. https://www.planobnovy.sk/site/assets/files/1046/komponent_07_vzdelavanie-21-storocie_1.pdf
  22. Pišová, M.et al. (2013). Učitel expert: jeho charakteristiky a determinanty profesního rozvoje (na pozadí výuky cizích jazyků). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  23. Raganová, J. et al. (2019). Implementácia bádateľských aktivít do výučby prírodovedných predmetov v podmienkach slovenského školstva. B. Bystrica: Belianum.
  24. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. 2005. Econometrica, vol. 73, no 2. Go to original source...
  25. Rocard, M. et al. (2007). Science Education NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
  26. Rochovská, I. (2012). The issue of development of scientific literacy in the field of Pre-school and Elementary School Pedagogy. Journal of Preschool and Elementary School Education, 2(2), 115-155.
  27. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. E-learn space.
  28. Slovák, S. et al. (2022). Prpfesní pedagogická praxe v pregraduální přípravě učitelů odborných přemědmětů. Technika a vzdelávanie. B. Bystrica: Belianum.
  29. Stebila, J. (2007). The possibilities of development for individual competencies in traffic pupils literacy. Kompetencje kluczowe kategoria pedagogiki: studia porównawcze Polsko-Slowackie. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Universystetu Rzeszowskiego.
  30. Stebila, J. & Krišťák, Ľ. (2012). Self-reflexion as a phenomenon in regards to the professional competencies development of a teacher of specialized subjects. Technika a vzdelávanie. B. Bystrica: Belianum, roč. 1, č. 1.
  31. Stebila, J. et al. (2020). Didaktika pre učiteľov predmetu Technika. B. Bystrica: Belianum, 398 s.
  32. Stebila, J. et al. (2022). Bádateľsky orientované vyučovanie v technickom vzdelávaní. B. Bystrica: Belianum, 190 s.
  33. Stebila, J. & Hatvanyi, N. (2022). Výučbové moduly s experimentmi v bádateľsky orientovanom technickom vzdelávaní. B. Bystrica: Belianum, 128 s.
  34. Stefan, M. & Ciomos, F. (2010). The 8th and 9th grade students attitude towards teaching and learning physic. Acta Didactica Napocensia, roč. 3, č. 3.
  35. Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Kognitívní psychologie. Praha: Portál.
  36. Trna, J. & Trnová, E. (1998). Inovace přírodovedné úlohy jako vzdělávacího prostředku. Cesty k tvořivé škole. Brno: MU.
  37. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloot, N. (2001). Professional development and reforming science education: The role of teacher's practical knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 38, no. 2. Go to original source...
  38. Žáčok, Ľ. et al. (2022). Návrh a možnosti implementácie nového kurikula pre vzdelávaciu oblasť Človek a svet práce. Technika a vzdelávanie. B. Bystrica: Belianum.