Journal of Technology and Information Education 2017, 9(1):250-261 | DOI: 10.5507/jtie.2017.023

AVAILABILITY OF ICT TOOLS IN EDUCATION: MYTH OR REALITY?

Milan KLEMENT
Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Česká republika

The constant evolution of digital technologies, including its implementation in education, places new demands on teachers who have to be prepared to work with modern ICT tools. That is why new demands are placed on the teacher in this modern teaching paradigm. However, the question is whether schools or teachers are able to use ICT tools in teaching, as the availability of the later are also a prerequisite for their use in the process of education.

The main objective of this research is to describe the current state of the use of ICT tools in the education process at Czech schools, using the methods of educational research. The paper summarizes selected partial results of realized research, which show that, at least in terms of ICT tools and by electronic learning materials, schools seem to be adequately equipped.

Keywords: Educational process, ICT tools, ICT tools supported teaching.

Received: May 10, 2017; Accepted: October 2, 2017; Published: April 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KLEMENT, M. (2017). AVAILABILITY OF ICT TOOLS IN EDUCATION: MYTH OR REALITY? Journal of Technology and Information Education9(1), 250-261. doi: 10.5507/jtie.2017.023
Download citation

References

  1. Barešová, A. (2003). E-learning ve vzdělávání dospělých. Praha: VOX. 110 s.
  2. Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5), s. 12-31. Go to original source...
  3. Brdička, B. (2009). Jak učit ve všudypřítomném mraku informací? P. Sojka, J. Rambousek (eds.), SCO 2009, sborník 6. ročníku konference o elektronické podpoře výuky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, s. 22-34.
  4. Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 510 s.
  5. Eger, L. (2002). Příprava tutorů pro distanční výuku s využitím on-line formy studia. Plzeň: ZČU. 82 s.
  6. Gavora, P. (2010). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido. 261 s.
  7. Chráska, M. & Kočvarová, I. (2015). Kvantitativní metody sběru dat v pedagogických výzkumech. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta humanitních studií. 132 s.
  8. Iiyoshi, T. & Vijay, M. S. (2008). Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Chicago: M.I.T. Press. 265 s.
  9. Jonnasen, D. H. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems with technology: A Constructivist Perspective. New Jersey: Merill Prentice Hall. 154 s.
  10. Klement, M. (2015). Způsoby rozvoje kompetencí učitelů v oblasti práce s moderními didaktickými prostředky. Trends in Education 8(1), s. 193-201. Go to original source...
  11. Klímek, P., Stříž, P. & Kasal, R. (2009). Počítačové zpracování dat v programu STATISTICA. Bučovice: Martin Stříž. 102 s.
  12. Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Athabasca: AU Press, s. 26-32. Go to original source...
  13. Kopecký, K. (2006). E-learning (nejen) pro pedagogy. Olomouc: Hanex. 121 s.
  14. Li, Y. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education White Paper. University of Bolton: CETIS, 2013. 117 s.
  15. Lupač, P. (2011). Mýty (a realita) digitální generace [online]. Lupa, 2011 [cit. 2016-01-10]. Dostupné na: http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/myty-a-realita-digitalni-generace/
  16. Matt, S. & Fernandez, L. (2013). Before MOOCs, Colleges of the Air. Chronicle of Higher Education, 40(2). Washington D.C., s 123-144.
  17. Palfrey, J. & Glasser, U. (2008). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. Oxford: Oxford Press. 310 s.
  18. Parr, Ch. (2012). "Mooc creators criticise courses' lack of creativity". Times Higher Education, 10(4). London, TSL Education, s. 45-72.
  19. Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Online Education and Learning Management Systems - Global Elearning in a Scandinavian Perspective. Oslo: NKI Forlaget. 337 s.
  20. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon 12(2), s. 7-11. Go to original source...
  21. Prensky, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate 13(2), s. 45-61.
  22. Průcha, J., Walterová, E., & Mareš, J. (2005). Pedagogický slovník. 3. ed. Praha: Portál Vydavatelství, 284 s.
  23. Survey of Schools: ICT in Education Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe's Schools. 2013. [cit. 2016-5-25]. Dostupné na: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf.
  24. Šimonová, I. (2010). Styly učení v aplikacích eLearningu. Hradec Králové: M&V. 212 s.
  25. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. 76 s.
  26. Veen, W. & Vrakking, B. (2006). Homo Zappiens. Growing Up In A Digital Age. London: Network Continnum Education. 96 s.
  27. Zounek, J. & Sudický, P. (2012). E-learning učení se s online technologiemi. Praha: Wolters Kluwer. 248 s.
  28. Zounek, J. & Šeďová, K. (2009). Učitelé a technologie: mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím. Brno: Paido. 154 s.
  29. Zounek, J. (2009). E-learning - jedna z podob učení v moderní společnosti. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. 161 s.
  30. Zounek, J. (2009). E-learning ve školním vzdělávání. In Průcha, J. a kol. Pedagogická encyklopedie. Praha: Portál, s. 277 - 281.